I have been able to capture to another app. Now, I determined, for my purposes, that what you hear when monitoring is correct. Even though we're talking about the bottom bit, the distortion products from truncation (if it is truncation) should be well above -90.3. Can we hear it? I think I can on some material (and if jdg can, that's good enough for me). or saved), which is anytime you use anything other than 16 bit source material, or do any processing.Īs the esteemed gentleman from Austin wrote, disc and source do not null (other than under the above conditions). Like I said, in your situation, WB is free and does assembly work very well.Ĭould you explain a bit more when you say "burn accurate discs"? What do you mean - is the disc data screwy somehow, and can you show us any evidence of this?- sure James, I believe I said "burn bit accurate discs." WB seems to be truncating to 15 bits whenever it bounces to 16 bit (temp. at least at first glance, seems even stranger than SS software. I own Wave Editor, which I bought mostly for SRC, and partly for the promise that it would one day be the new WB or even Sound Blade. I lose a few minutes during these times but the vast majority of my work are album with songs, not one-piece opuses so very little inconvenience here due to these two "flaws". It also cannot handle overs without distortion which can be a problem with cross-faded material once in a while.īoth these issues cause me to go back to my processing program and do it there then reload in WB. As far as my work goes, the only thing that it doesn't do is allow volume curves to be graduated in a region. WB is very easy to use and has very, very few flaws as an assembly program. Do a search on the mastering webboards and you will see what I mean. Props to Jerry and others who are using it, or sometimes using it. Without experience on the old Sonic Solutions software, you may find the new Sonic software to be incomprehensible! One has to have a lot of resove and intitiative to dive into this software! If you have to get Logic, you get WaveBurner for free. Is it really that good, like I saw in the videos? I use Ozone and must admit it is not as bad to my ears as some guys say here.ĪndrewjTo me, it's a no-brainer. If you vote for Waveeditor polease tell me why it is the better tool?īTW: What about the Izotope RX stuff. So my question: If I already have Wavebruner in the Logic bundle, should I invest into Waveeditor, or is Wavebruner enough for the moment? I have to get Logic for some future mixing jobs. The stuff of sonic is real old and I know it is still good, but it is too expensive for me at the moment. So far I have a nice selection of hardware and pluggies to optimize the tracks to each other, but I have no software to put the tracks together and make a red book compatible premaster the I can also burn for the clients. I wanna start off my mastering career with something not so expensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |